<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running Back By Committee: Monopoly Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepigskindoctors.com/2009/10/rbbc-opoly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepigskindoctors.com/2009/10/rbbc-opoly/</link>
	<description>MLB News, Rumors, Interviews and Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 01:14:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturday Link-Off: Social Media Fail &#171; The Lowdown Blog</title>
		<link>http://thepigskindoctors.com/2009/10/rbbc-opoly/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturday Link-Off: Social Media Fail &#171; The Lowdown Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepigskindoctors.com/?p=591#comment-95</guid>
		<description>[...] The latest in tips for your fantasy football team: Running Back By Committee-opoly. (The Pigskin Doctors) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The latest in tips for your fantasy football team: Running Back By Committee-opoly. (The Pigskin Doctors) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pyle of List &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pyle of Crap! Thursday Edition</title>
		<link>http://thepigskindoctors.com/2009/10/rbbc-opoly/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Pyle of List &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pyle of Crap! Thursday Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepigskindoctors.com/?p=591#comment-88</guid>
		<description>[...] Running Back by committee sucks for fantasy football, but might work out great for a new board game. The Pigskin Doctors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Running Back by committee sucks for fantasy football, but might work out great for a new board game. The Pigskin Doctors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Blitz: Coin Toss Research and Running Back Monopoly! &#187; BlitzNation &#187; Blog</title>
		<link>http://thepigskindoctors.com/2009/10/rbbc-opoly/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Blitz: Coin Toss Research and Running Back Monopoly! &#187; BlitzNation &#187; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepigskindoctors.com/?p=591#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] Running Back by Committee: Monopoly-style - The Pigskin Doctors Because when you&#8217;re fantasy team gets you down, there&#8217;s nothing like a good old fashioned game of running back by committee monopoly. Ahhh, the memories. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Running Back by Committee: Monopoly-style &#8211; The Pigskin Doctors Because when you&#8217;re fantasy team gets you down, there&#8217;s nothing like a good old fashioned game of running back by committee monopoly. Ahhh, the memories. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Running Back By Committee Monopoly Board : a better strategy for FF owners? &#124; read and react</title>
		<link>http://thepigskindoctors.com/2009/10/rbbc-opoly/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Running Back By Committee Monopoly Board : a better strategy for FF owners? &#124; read and react</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepigskindoctors.com/?p=591#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] props (yeah, I said it) to the guys at PigskinDoctors for coming up with this Running Back By Committee Monopoly Board.  They pretty much nailed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] props (yeah, I said it) to the guys at PigskinDoctors for coming up with this Running Back By Committee Monopoly Board.  They pretty much nailed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://thepigskindoctors.com/2009/10/rbbc-opoly/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepigskindoctors.com/?p=591#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Yes Ronnie Brown and Ricky Williams are a good pair - but What About Adrian Peterson and Chester Taylor for Boardwalk and Park Place.

If they are not the best duo - no one is.

Or better yet - Adrian Peterson for Free Parking and Chester Taylor for GO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Ronnie Brown and Ricky Williams are a good pair &#8211; but What About Adrian Peterson and Chester Taylor for Boardwalk and Park Place.</p>
<p>If they are not the best duo &#8211; no one is.</p>
<p>Or better yet &#8211; Adrian Peterson for Free Parking and Chester Taylor for GO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://thepigskindoctors.com/2009/10/rbbc-opoly/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepigskindoctors.com/?p=591#comment-81</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Digg by thegamingguy: I somehow managed to move some players around and have LT and Shaun Alexander in my lineup for a championship season.  Now making that statement is laughable....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Digg by thegamingguy: I somehow managed to move some players around and have LT and Shaun Alexander in my lineup for a championship season.  Now making that statement is laughable&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

